riddler question mark

images character, The Riddler. riddler question mark. riddler question mark. that#39;s not a question mark
  • riddler question mark. that#39;s not a question mark



  • Macaca
    09-10 02:33 PM
    Hey Andy! Come over to DC on 18th





    wallpaper riddler question mark. that#39;s not a question mark riddler question mark. as a total question mark?
  • as a total question mark?



  • acecupid
    07-03 12:50 PM
    I remember there was a proposal to give one Green Card per family to eliminate the retrogression for EB categories. I don't know what happen to that. It was like one year ago or so.

    Thats a wonderful idea. Amen to that!





    riddler question mark. THE RIDDLER Question Mark Vinyl Decal Car Sticker M276 | eBay
  • THE RIDDLER Question Mark Vinyl Decal Car Sticker M276 | eBay



  • kavita
    12-10 07:47 PM
    don't you think that working towards removing unfair country quota in skilled category would be faster & easier than population control?

    Now that you are enlighted about being one among too many, are you planning to go back, and reduce backlog for others?

    Also, when talking about reducing indian population, I hope that you do not agree with what 10 pakistanis tried to do in mumbai few days back!!! That is one very bad way of reducing population! I would prefer load balancing i.e. moving some ppl to part of world where population is not so much.

    Jokes apart, we need to seriously highlight the fact that as there is no country quota in H1B, since it is a skilled category visa, similarly there should be no country quota in skill based immigration too. It is nothing but simply 'DESCRIMINATION" based on country of birth. Do we have guts to fight that??? we can only talk about some stupid solutions but have no unity, no guts and no willingness to stand up for our community.


    I absolutely agree with you. I can't imagine how a person of Indian or Chinese origin can blame themselves of this retrogression. To me, it is a reflection of poor self esteem.
    The bottomline is that we are here because we are needed here. We have the privilege to apply for green card in return for the work we do. Country quota does not make sense in employment based immigration. It is an unfair practice which has to stop someday.





    2011 as a total question mark? riddler question mark. RIDDLER CANE Question Mark
  • RIDDLER CANE Question Mark



  • harrybond
    08-19 03:34 PM
    [

    JunRN
    Senior Member


    what's ur reasoning behind ur statement?
    QUOTE=JunRN;150114]To understand the Visa bulletin, one must first understand that it is not the USCIS that computes or post VB, it is the DOS. DOS also considers those undergoing consular processing. In this case, the dates are in favor of those doing CP as we all know that most of those who are qualified to apply for AOS have already applied.

    Retrogression is a CP-friendly event.[/QUOTE]



    more...


    riddler question mark. question mark character 3
  • question mark character 3



  • Jbpvisa
    07-12 11:01 PM
    http://www.murthy.com/chertoff_murthy.html

    July 12, 2007

    VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
    Michael Chertoff, Esq.
    Secretary
    Department of Homeland Security


    RE: USCIS Decision to Reject I-485 Filings

    Dear Mr. Chertoff:

    It was a pleasure and an honor to meet with you and to share my views during your panel discussion at the Harvard Worldwide Congress June 15, 2007 in Washington, D.C. I understand and appreciate that the responsibility vested in you as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is no simple task. We applaud your service to our nation. After meeting with you personally and speaking with you, I am more convinced than ever that you will do the right thing for our country and for the people you serve, both in terms of securing our nation and in being the leader of the DHS, with over 20 federal agencies reporting to you, including the USCIS.

    Purpose of this Letter

    I am writing to you at this time to address recent actions by the USCIS to refuse to accept I-485 adjustment of status filing during July 2007 that are having significant impact upon the reliability of the legal immigration system in this country, as well as impacting legal foreign nationals and the many U.S. businesses that rely upon the work they perform.

    USCIS Decision Contradicts its Long Standing Procedure

    In contradiction of its own long standing policy and procedure, we understand that the USCIS, through its Director Gonzalez, contacted the U.S. Department of State (DOS) and requested or required the DOS to issue a �revised� Visa Bulletin on July 2, 2007. The USCIS then used the revised Bulletin to refuse to accept I-485 filings. This decision deprives thousands of foreign nationals, and their families, of the rights and privileges that are attendant to the I-485 filing.

    These Highly Skilled Professionals Followed All the Rules and Believe in the American Dream

    These professionals and their employers have played by our established immigration laws and rules. The vast majority of these thousands of potential applicants has a U.S. employer corporation, university or other business as a sponsor for permanent resident status. The exceptions from an employer are for those who are considered of �extraordinary ability� or whose work is in our �national interest.� Many of these applicants have completed their Bachelor�s, Master�s and/or PhD programs from U.S. universities. They believe in the opportunities of this great nation and strive to achieve the American Dream by following all the rules, working hard, paying taxes, and striving to do the right thing. They believe in this country, and rely upon our systems, our government, and our processes. Unfortunately, on July 2, 2007, we let them down. The USCIS abandoned its own system and long standing practices. This happened through manipulation of the use of visa numbers, insisting upon the issuance of a "revised visa bulletin," and instituting the USCIS policy of rejecting every employment-based I-485 that could have been filed during the month of July 2007.

    USCIS Decision Denies Substantive and Procedural Rights to Highly Skilled Workers and Their Employers - Many of Whom Have Already Suffered and Will Suffer Further Harm/ Injury

    Not only does the USCIS' action harm the individuals and employers involved, it undermines the reliability of our entire employment-based immigration system. The unexpected decision of the USCIS to refuse to accept any I-485 filings denies both substantive and procedural due process rights to would be applicants across the U.S. All of these applicants are employment based (EB) applicants who are primarily highly skilled professionals or experienced workers, that the U.S. seeks in high demand areas, including: science, technology, medicine, research, business, academia, and education.

    The harm in not accepting the filings in July 2007 goes beyond mere delay. In reliance upon the July Visa Bulletin, starting in mid-June 2007, these applicants took the steps necessary to prepare their filings and made decisions in reliance upon the USCIS accepting their filings during July 2007. In order to be present in the U.S., as required for these filings, many applicants and their families canceled travel plans abroad or arranged to return to the U.S. on short notice missing family weddings and other important life events. They undertook medical examinations and paid for the required tests which must accompany the I-485 filings. (The USCIS had refused to waive this requirement even temporarily.) They hired lawyers to process their paperwork; they arranged to obtain documents from abroad on an expedited basis, involving foreign lawyers and foreign governments, all at a significant cost. They made employment and other strategic immigration related decisions to be able to process their I-485s for them and their families. Some canceled visa appointments at the consulates, or withdrew other immigration filings, all in reliance upon the USCIS accepting I-485 filings during July 2007.

    The applicants and their employers lose the rights and privileges that accompany the filing of the I-485. These include eligibility for the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and Advanced Parole (AP), thus eliminating the need for the individuals and their employers to make the filings necessary to maintain a non-immigrant, temporary status. These same ancillary benefits also apply to dependant family members. Most importantly, those that have not filed I-485s are not eligible for "portability" benefits under the �American Competitiveness in the Twenty First Century Act� of Oct. 2000 or �AC21� as it is sometimes referred to. This ineligibility for AC21 portability forces career stagnation. This is to the detriment of the individual as well as their sponsoring employer. Under AC21 portability, employers can promote and/or relocate employees to positions that are the same or similar job classifications as the positions for which they were initially sponsored. Individuals can utilize these provisions for career advancement, and for entrepreneurship. Given that the green card process often spans many years, AC21 portability allows the necessary flexibility to permit the case to continue, to accommodate changes in the sponsoring employer's needs as well as opportunities that are specific to the beneficiary.

    The list of stories of individuals and families harmed by the USCIS decision is endless. We have for example, many spouses who will now be separated potentially for years on end, as one received a green card during the USCIS' June "rush," while the other is now ineligible to file.

    The USCIS decision also created a burden on U.S. employers. Further delays in the green card process mean that, at best, U.S. employers have to continue to file temporary petitions to keep their workforce in the U.S. legally; at worst, it jeopardizes the availability of this needed highly educated and skilled workforce.

    USCIS Motive is to Collect Millions of Additional Filing Fees

    Many are baffled by the USCIS decision to reject I-485 filings in July, and its use of the �revised� Visa Bulletin as an excuse. The suspected motive is the collection of the substantially higher filing fees that will be generated after July 27, 2007. This entire incident sends the wrong message about our government, our policies and our legal system reeking of greed and inconsistency. Even the appearance of such impropriety undermines our system.

    .................
    continue





    riddler question mark. The Riddler In Catwoman: When
  • The Riddler In Catwoman: When



  • imneedy
    05-06 02:27 PM
    I got a reply from USCIS saying that they can process the request sorted by priority date and country of birth of the applicant. Processing time will be around 15 months and that they have got their answer on priority date.

    what are the next steps?



    more...


    riddler question mark. Riddler Question Mark Lean (30
  • Riddler Question Mark Lean (30



  • lazycis
    12-20 08:54 PM
    I think so. I went in an out of country 4 times. 2 Indian trips and 2 Canadian trips.

    That's just another proof. A person who accumulated more than 180 days of unlawful presence is inadmissible into the US (at least for 3 years).





    2010 THE RIDDLER Question Mark Vinyl Decal Car Sticker M276 | eBay riddler question mark. character, The Riddler.
  • character, The Riddler.



  • mirage
    02-06 09:40 AM
    You got my point, sir!!!
    Though I am posting very late, I fully agree with the intent of the thread starter. If there is anything that we can convince the "balanced" law makers, it is the discrimination based on country based quota.
    A person with certain skill set brings same and equal benefits to this country. S/He is hired because the economy of this country needs him/her. Then why issue green card to one because s/he was born in XYZ country and why ask another to wait almost endlessly because s/he was born in ABC country. This is absurd, unjust, unfair and discriminatory, particularly considering the values that United States respects, believes in and follows.
    We can sell only this one point to law makers. Selling an idea on how much benefits we bring to this country, and if we can buy homes with 20% down payment, is like waking up a person who is pretending to be asleep. They have decided not to buy that argument no matter what. And then there is Dick Durbyn, Grassley, Jeff Sessions, Steve King and many like them...............



    more...


    riddler question mark. use of question marks? riddler question mark. question-mark-covered
  • use of question marks? riddler question mark. question-mark-covered



  • needhelp!
    11-25 06:25 PM
    I got the same reply. Its standard when they send you your case number.

    Here's my case Number: NRC2008065126





    hair RIDDLER CANE Question Mark riddler question mark. riddler question mark. this is
  • riddler question mark. this is



  • arnab221
    09-26 09:39 AM
    This is bad what has happened. They need to be educated about the protest.

    Is there any email address to the CNN editor? I can writeup a message about this.


    You can send the message to editor from the message itself . We should all do that and educate them about what we really need .



    more...


    riddler question mark. trophies and question mark; riddler question mark. He has a question mark
  • trophies and question mark; riddler question mark. He has a question mark



  • go_gc_way
    01-18 04:20 PM
    we need some more members to keep this effort stay ignited. This effort has helped us get several hundred members in the past few weeks. Pls continue to help. It will only take 15 min of your time.

    Thanks Pappu :D (Pappu, left a PM, pl reply. Wouldn't mind if you don't come back , you are busy. Thanks)

    Several hundred members ... only about 50 posts !!

    That's true, once it is posted on a web site, most likely many members of that site will come read the thread. How many will read, will go on increasing each day, east posting.

    Extraordinary effort perm2gc and others, please keep it up !!

    Members , give it a thought ... give a free gift, more the members ...best our efforts.





    hot question mark character 3 riddler question mark. riddler question mark. Question mark resin design
  • riddler question mark. Question mark resin design



  • Macaca
    09-26 11:46 AM
    I just got a call from Eilene Zimmerman regarding the article and she promised me that she is working on fixing the error soon
    The article is actually very well-written for H1B issues. Ask her to write a similar article about EB GC issues!



    more...


    house Tracing the question mark riddler question mark. guy with the question mark; riddler question mark. question mark,
  • guy with the question mark; riddler question mark. question mark,



  • kshitijnt
    07-13 07:53 PM
    Guys:

    Atleast appreciate the letter she has written. Maybe you are not satisfied by attorney Murthy and she has not done enough for you. But here she is adding to the voice for immigrants. Something is better than nothing!!!





    tattoo The Riddler In Catwoman: When riddler question mark. riddler question mark. Question Mark Launcher; Question Mark Launcher
  • riddler question mark. Question Mark Launcher; Question Mark Launcher



  • sodh
    07-23 03:39 PM
    Do you have any document from CIS? Need some proof to fight.
    Important missing documents,USCIS can reject an application on their discretion, no need for RFE.



    more...


    pictures Riddler Question Mark Lean (30 riddler question mark. Riddler
  • Riddler



  • virtual55
    07-05 01:16 PM
    Yes I aggree. I think we have reached a stage where there are at least around 1000 members who flock to IV, when they need help on any GC related issue.

    Why not make IV paid membership? IV core team's work and persistance has made this site an integral part of all GC apsirants' lives.
    Peole value this site/it's opinions etc. There is nothing wrong in make them pay for it ONLY because we are on so shoestring budget. Our efforts can be more fruitful if core is having enough funds at disposal.

    Those who care about IV efforts ,who care about themselves and GC will definitely join and those who wanted this site to be non paid will realize and will also join as paid members later on.





    dresses riddler question mark. Question mark resin design riddler question mark. guy with the question mark
  • guy with the question mark



  • moonlight
    06-20 12:39 PM
    I doubt about illegal of taking color copy of driver license.
    If it is why would lawyers ask for it. My lawyer asked for color copy.



    more...


    makeup use of question marks? riddler question mark. question-mark-covered riddler question mark. Tracing the question mark
  • Tracing the question mark



  • desi3933
    01-30 11:05 PM
    Will she get paid starting Feb 1st? If no, why not. Please explain.

    She wont get paid starting Feb 1 but there is an option to get paid from Feb 1 - April 20 as she accumulated some $ when she was working and after April 20 she will be on maternity leave which will be unpaid.

    To answer why she will not get paid - she does not have a project right now and dont even plan to find one....(bad economy and no one will be willing to employ a preg. female who will need 6-8 week vacation after 2 month of hire)

    Will she on unpaid leave? Yes.

    Will she still be Full Time Employee? For the employer C which is a desi consulting firm she is a FTE but you know how the consulting business works........as long as you are on project you get your salary and the day you are not on the project you dont get a dime.

    On H1 Status, one must be working full time and should be paid salary even if s/he is on benching. Three month maternity leave should be ok, but 6 months of unpaid leave will be very difficult to explain.

    You should seriously consider changing status to H4, if that is an option.

    In Nov, she can re-enter on H1 visa to come back to H1 status.

    ____________________
    Not a legal advice.
    US Citizen of Indian Origin





    girlfriend riddler question mark. Question Mark Launcher; Question Mark Launcher riddler question mark. Renee/Question II Riddler
  • Renee/Question II Riddler



  • karan007
    03-07 05:09 AM
    I am in the same boat. Consulted 2 attorneys, both of them provided very different overview. As per one using AC21 was very easy, didn't require much paperwork from employer (letter of employment with job responsibilities). The other one suggested that the new employer needs to support the green card process & made it sound like serious work.

    Another interesting note was, the attorney who mentioned it was easy, would have charged $500 for the process vs $2500 + expenses. So kind off figured that one has to justify charge $2,500, hence the additional paperwork, etc (scare factor).

    I did some research over the web. Came to the conclusion that utilizing AC21 is pretty simple. I am moving forward with it and starting my new job in April.

    Since this is a big decision, I would suggest that you get a second opinion

    Good Luck...





    hairstyles trophies and question mark; riddler question mark. He has a question mark riddler question mark. THE RIDDLER Question Mark
  • THE RIDDLER Question Mark



  • Pineapple
    10-26 10:19 AM
    Notarized and mailed my FOIA request last week.





    kaella
    06-11 10:43 AM
    Just did it.





    sanjaymk
    07-17 06:34 PM
    Here is a rough draft of what we could use for the Webfax, please feel free to add/modify and change it to get to the final version. I feel it is a little too long so feel free to suggest your changes.

    The Truth Shall Set You Free � Bible.
    OR
    This country will not be a good place for any of us to live in unless we make it a good place for all of us to live in. ~Theodore Roosevelt

    Respected <<Senator>>,

    I would like to bring it to your attention some of the false propaganda and myths about highly-skilled H1B workers that are being fabricated and spread among the Senators. Most notable among them is a fax from NumbersUSA organization.

    NumbersUSA has been faxing the below document to Senators and Congressman and urging them to vote against the SKIL bill act. I would like to bring it to your attention that this document is filled with blatantly untrue and misleading statements.

    Dear [This fax will go to Your U.S. Senators and U.S. Representative ]

    I oppose any increase in the annual H-1B visa cap, including those in the SKIL Act. I am counting on you to oppose it.

    Here are just a few reasons why I hope you will oppose the SKIL Act:

    (1) The six-year visas allow foreign workers to bring in their families, and guarantee thousands of anchor babies.
    (2) H-1B salaries are tax-exempt - no FICA, no federal or state income taxes. They can live at the same level as tax-paying Americans at a lower cost. Therefore, Congress allows foreigners to "low-ball" American workers.

    (3) H-1Bs can leave the job they came to fill and seek other jobs, not necessarily in the "hard to fill" category.

    (4) Most H-1Bs are of a "protected" ethnic group, so H-1Bs have an affirmative action preference when competing with Americans for the same jobs.

    I would like to take the second point and prove the fallacy of this vicious propoganda.

    A simple google search of the key words (alien taxation), leads me to this IRS document http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/international/article/0,,id=129431,00.html that unambiguously states right at the beginning that

    ..the controlling principle is that RESIDENT ALIENS are taxed in the same manner as U.S. citizens on their worldwide income

    Further links in the same website lucidly and succinctly explains with clear examples the taxes for highly skilled H1B workers(The links to these documents are furnished in the Appendix.)

    As a resident of your state I would like my representatives to use their precious votes based on sound facts and information from credible and trustworthy sources, because the last thing a representative would want is their constituents doubting their credibility and decision making.

    I sincerely, kindly and respectfully urge you to kindly take this into account while making your decisions in the future.

    Respectfully Yours,
    <Name>


    Appendix.
    ========

    http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc851.html
    http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/international/article/0,,id=129428,00.html (Example 8 specifically)


    ================================================== =====



    Total Pageviews